the five stages of grading

By dr. b ⋅ October 9, 2010 ⋅ Post a comment
Filed Under grades, humour, lists, marking, students

Reblogged from: http://notthatkindofdoctor.com/2010/10/the-five-stages-of-grading/


Everyone is familiar with Elisabeth Kübler-Ross and her stage model of coping with grief popularly known as the five stages of grief. What you may not know is that Kübler-Ross actually developed her theory as a graduate student, basing her conception of the process of loss on the experiences one goes through over a grading weekend.



In coping with grading, it’s important for graduate students and young professors to know that they are not alone and that this process takes time. Not everyone goes through every stage or processes the reality of grading in this order, but everyone experiences some version of at least two of these steps.

1. Denial. At this stage, the instructor is unwilling to acknowledge the size of the task ahead of him or her. An instructor in denial may be heard to say things like, “It’s not really that many essays, when you think about it.” An instructor in denial will grossly overestimate his or her potential assignment-per-hour output. Denial at the syllabus-creation stage of course development can lead to tears. Denial can also manifest itself as avoidance, where grading is put aside in favour of vastly more important activities like cleaning the fridge, baking, working out, or writing elaborate blog posts about the stages of grading.
2. Anger. Usually anger begins once the instructor starts grading. The first few papers are likely to excite the grader, but as a steady stream of errors trickles in, the instructor may become disillusioned. Commonly heard at this stage: “But we covered this in class! A lot!” “Wait, what does this even mean?” “Redundant! This is redundant!” Instructors at this stage of the process are likely to have unnecessarily large reactions to relatively small frustrations; for example, in one case an instructor screamed into a pillow upon discovering that every student in the class was still using “they” as a singular pronoun.
3. Bargaining. This stage usually begins as an earnest attempt to buckle down and grade. The instructor might say, “If I grade five papers, I can watch one episode of House,” or, “For every page I grade, I get to eat a piece of candy.” This process starts well, but as the instructor progresses the amount of work required to achieve the reward generally becomes smaller and smaller, until the instructor is checking Facebook after every sentence he or she grades.
4. Depression. At some point in a marking weekend, the instructor will come to realize that in spite of his or her best intentions, the papers won’t be marked in time for the next class. For the idealistic young instructor, this is also usually the moment he or she realizes that the assignments themselves are not particularly strong. These realizations can lead to feelings of failure, spiralling into reality TV watchathons or video game blitzes instead of grading. Ultimately, though, recognizing one’s limitations is a healthy part of the process that leads directly to the final stage.
5. Acceptance/Resignation. At some point, the instructor comes to term with the reality that the papers must be graded. This reality is usually acknowledged the afternoon before the instructor wishes to return the papers, leading to an all-night grading blitz. At some point and by some miracle, however, it all gets done, and the instructor is primed and ready to start to the process over again when the next major assignment comes in.

The Metaphor of the Course Card Day in the DLSU System

In the De La Salle University in Taft Avenue, Manila, it has been a practice at the end of the term that students meet their class adviser for the course card distribution. While it is an optional attendance for the students, it is necessary for the teacher or professor to be present at that time.

It is an opportunity for the students to get an understanding why she (or he) got a passing or failing grade, why she obtained better markings than her group mates or what were her shortcomings that prevented her to be in the dean's list.

Hence, there are many different kinds of reactions that can be observed during the course card day. Sometimes you hear crying and whining in the toilet. Sometimes you will just hear an outburst of giggle or sudden expression of relief like "Yes! I survived not only Math but Prof.__" The sound of satisfaction is there. I remember a student about to fail, his boyfriend who was also her classmate was trying to save her. He was giving a portion of his grade to save her girlfriend. In another instance, there was also this student asking for extra points. He was a graduating student and it was going to be the first time he will be included in the dean's list (a late bloomer I guess). If I give him the extra points he needed, he will make it to the dean's list, for the first time, on the last term of his stay in the university.

For the teacher or professor, in my opinion, the course card day is more than just making it clear to the students that she was fair and objective in giving the grades. It is also more than being responsible in the assigned schedule of distribution so the attendance checker will not mark her as absent.

The course card day carries a strong metaphor of what it is to be a teacher. It is a metaphor of HOPE. It allows the teacher to tell her students that good grades entail sacrifices, diligence and exerting efforts more than what is expected. It is a metaphor of COMPASSION. Students have different reasons for not being able to exhibit their best or perform well. Some of these reasons are true and some are evidently artificial. A teacher, with close communication with the students permit her to know if a student is being honest or not. And the teacher on this course card day, has also this opportunity to grant compassion to deserving students in various ways. The course card is also a metaphor of WISDOM. Students sometimes see only the list of requirements she has complied to. But the rationale of the teacher why she gave a low score or average score or an excellent score is part of the expertise and judgment of the teacher. The students oftentimes, cannot espouse this. So the teacher has to provide the objective explanation of all of these things. I also call it the wisdom of the guru. It is this wisdom that can appease the heart of a student in fire.

----------------

For the past one and a half year, the tradition of the course card day was removed by the Registrar's office. Thanks to technology, the faculty inputs their grades and the students view them online. The students have a chance to ask about their grade breakdown on a consultation day, the day after they viewed their grades online.

While it is a convenient way perhaps for the university administration to take away a very busy course card day, it meant removing a university tradition.

The course card day is a very exciting day for the students and the faculty. It is the last meeting at the end of the term. It is the 'thank you', the 'good luck', the 'keep it up', 'have a pleasant vacation', or 'see you next term' events. It is a closure of the formal teacher-student encounter but may also be the beginning of a good friendship or acquaintance between the student and the teacher.

Many progressive changes are taking place in the university right now. But for me, it is sad to see we are losing some of the better traditions we have. The course card day is a tradition we lost. If Saint John Baptist de La Salle, patron saint of the teachers, is alive today, what will he say about this?